About B2B TechSelect

What We Publish

B2B TechSelect publishes independent, methodology-led rankings of enterprise B2B vendors across commerce, ERP-integrated software, and complex digital transformation categories. Every ranking is anchored to a published scoring framework, transparent evidence standards, and stated limitations. No vendor pays for inclusion. No vendor has editorial input on positioning. Our revenue model is independent of ranking outcomes.

The current research focus is ecommerce consulting and adjacent enterprise commerce categories. Future categories under development include ERP integration partners, headless commerce specialists, PIM consultants, and B2B marketplace platforms.

Why Independent Rankings Matter

Most "top vendor" lists on the open web are pay-to-play directories, lightly disguised affiliate funnels, or aggregations of marketing claims with no editorial standards behind them. Buyers can tell, which is why third-party reviews and analyst opinions have become the primary trust signals in enterprise vendor research.

B2B TechSelect was built to publish the kind of analysis a sophisticated buyer would write for themselves if they had the time: weighted scoring against published criteria, evidence cross-checked across multiple sources, honest limitations stated alongside strengths, and recommendations grounded in buyer scenarios rather than vendor categories.

How We Work

• Public methodology. Every ranking is anchored to a published, weighted framework. The methodology for the ecommerce consultants ranking is at /methodology/.
• Cross-checked evidence. Vendor claims are tested against third-party sources (Clutch, G2, partner directories, named case studies). Where evidence is weak, we say so.
• Honest limitations. Every vendor profile states what the vendor is not good for, alongside what they are good for. A ranking that only lists strengths is not a ranking; it is a press release.
• No paid placements. No vendor pays for inclusion or positioning. No vendor sees draft positioning before publication. The publication does not accept revenue-share, affiliate, or referral compensation from any vendor evaluated.
• Rolling updates. Rankings are republished as new evidence becomes available. Position changes require evidence, not anecdote.

Full editorial policy and disclosure is at /disclosure/.

Nina Kavulia, Principal Analyst

Nina Kavulia leads B2B TechSelect's research practice. She covers B2B vendor selection across enterprise commerce, ERP-integrated software, and complex digital transformation programs. Her work focuses on the buyer-side of complex software selection: discovery methodology, evaluation frameworks, governance through delivery, and post-launch risk reduction.

Nina's analysis is anchored in the practical reality of mid-market and enterprise buying: that the dimensions which determine outcomes (ERP integration, B2B logic, replatforming risk, governance) are systematically underweighted by traditional "best of" lists, and that the published methodology is itself a trust signal worth reading.

Find Nina on LinkedIn.

Reach Us

For feedback on a ranking, evidence corrections, or methodology questions, contact us via the B2B TechSelect LinkedIn page. Vendors who want to share updated evidence (new case studies, certifications, organizational changes) are encouraged to do so; evidence is reviewed against the published methodology, not against marketing claims.

We do not accept paid placements, paid reviews, or sponsored rankings.